IT'S ABOUT TIME: CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHY, DIACHRONEITY, AND THE DEFINITION OF THE ANTHROPOCENE
The recent decisions taken within the ICS regarding the initial proposal for the Anthropocene highlighted several significant challenges facing the process of attempting to find a formal definition and ratifying a Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) in the future. The flurry of press surrounding these recent decisions highlighted several discrepancies within the broader geoscience community and the procedures and objectives of formal definition of intervals of the Geologic Time Scale. Specifically, the question of diachroneity has been a central theme in many of the broader discussion of the definition of the Anthropocene, and unfortunately, has often been poorly represented in both the public discourse as well as the scientific literature. As mundane as the formal definition of the Anthropocene by the ICS may seem to geoscientists, this term has already become an entrenched part of the cultural zeitgeist. How we handle this term, and this process, will have much larger implications than just putting a new term on our chronostratigraphic chart.