Joint 60th Annual Northeastern/59th Annual North-Central Section Meeting - 2025

Paper No. 5-1
Presentation Time: 8:30 AM-5:30 PM

A COMPARISON OF METHODOLOGIES FOR QUANTIFYING MICROPLASTICS IN SOIL


LEVI-PRICE, Sadie1, CICHON, Patricia2, GROVES, Naomi3, LOSCO, Russell4 and ARNOLD, T. Elliott1, (1)Earth and Space Sciences, West Chester University, West Chester, PA 19383, (2)Earth and Space Science, West Chester University, 201 Carter drive, West Chester, PA 19383, (3)Earth and Space Science, West Chester University, West Chester, PA 19383, (4)Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, Delaware County Community College, 280 Pennocks Bridge Road, West Grove, PA 19390

Plastic has become a useful tool for almost everything including shopping, cooking, organizing, decorating, and much more. It has unfortunately also become a significant component of our environment. An alarming amount of microplastics (less than 5mm,) are being found in our water, our atmosphere, our food, and inside our bodies. Since microplastics have been found in a multitude of places, our research focused upon the source of our food and fiber; soil. To date, most research has focused upon microplastics in water. To extract possible microplastics from the soil many methods were used including density separation, hydrogen peroxide solution, olive oil separation, the use of magnetite, and more. Our research found that there were signs of microplastics in soils from various locations even including farm/garden soils. We further found that not all methods of extraction of microplastic from the soil were equal, with some being more or less effective.