2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004)

Paper No. 48
Presentation Time: 6:30 PM-8:30 PM

ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY LABORATORY: A MODEL FOR A LIBERAL STUDIES COURSE GROUNDED IN A REGIONAL FIELD SETTING


BURKHART, Patrick A., VAN DYNE, Ashley, JAHN, Michael and SCHIAPPA, Christopher, Geography, Geology and the Environment, Slippery Rock Univeristy, 107 SWC, Slippery Rock, PA 16057, patrick.burkhart@sru.edu

Environmental Geology Laboratory is an optional accompaniment to the lecture, which are the Department’s primary liberal studies science courses. The contributions of this package include extending scientific literacy, preparing teachers to present earth science more effectively, and recruiting majors. The content is focused upon a classic examination of geologic hazards – flooding and slope instability are locally prevalent – and contemporary issues, including intense regional pressures from urban sprawl, storm water runoff and soil erosion. The overarching educational goal is to develop rich understanding of geologic issues borne by the regional landscape through constructivist knowledge development. This curriculum has been reinforced through participation in the Pennsylvania Collaborative for Excellence in Teacher Preparation (CETP-PA).

The tools employed include an emphasis upon the local and regional landscape through an evolving, customized lab manual. Key to realizing the objectives is a series of field trips. On campus excursions examine changing land-use, runoff and erosion, slope instability, resource consumption, and waste disposal. Field trips in the vicinity of campus investigate floodplains, terraces, a gauging station, and acid mine drainage and its remediation. Regional field trips explore the Drake Well, coastal geology and ecology of Presque Isle, and landslides in Pittsburgh. Topographic maps are applied to most of these studies.

Success of the curriculum is demonstrated by student evaluations, popularity, and endorsement by CETP-PA of the lecture as constructivist. Students report tangibility, satisfaction with diverse assessment mechanisms, comfort with seeking assistance, and overall, a strongly favorable experience with natural science courses that were often approached reluctantly and with apprehension.