ADSORPTION OF PHARMACEUTICALS AND PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS (PPCPs) TO NANO-SCALE OXIDES
Results from this study illustrate how sorption can be controlled by the surface charge of the oxide NP and the overall charge on the attendant PPCPs. Over the pH range of the experiments (~6-8), PPCPs are either cationic, neutral, or anionic, and the net surface charge of oxide NPs depends on their PZC (point of zero charge; the pH value below which the NP has a net positive surface charge). For example, sorption of anionic ibuprofen and diclofenac to negatively-charged SiO2 (PZC=2) was negligible (Kd<0.1 L/kg), while sorption coefficients for these compounds to positively-charged MgO (PZC=12) were 43±8 L/kg and 394±66 L/kg, respectively.
Results from the study also demonstrate that compound charge and NP PZC are not the only parameters controlling sorption. For example, the cationic compound propanolol was the only compound with significant sorption to SiO2 (Kd=10±6 L/kg), but its sorption to positively-charged MgO was even greater (67±33 L/kg). Diclofenac was highly sorbed to Fe2O3 (PZC=~7; Kd=361±80 L/kg) and MgO (PZC=12; Kd=394±66 L/kg) compared to TiO2 (PZC=7.2; Kd=4.4±0.7 L/kg), CaO (PZC=~8; Kd=9.5±1.0), and Al2O3 (PZC= 9.1; Kd=9.6±0.9). Bisphenol-A exhibited much greater sorption to MgO (Kd=119±9 L/kg) than the other five NP (1.6 to 11 L/kg). Sorption coefficients for carbamazepine (<0.1 to 6.0 L/kg) and caffeine (0.6 to 2.9 L/kg) were relatively consistent for all six NP. Future work is planned to investigate the possible effects of nonlinear or competitive sorption, PPCP complexation, and NP aggregation.