LIMNOGEOLOGY OF URBAN AND SUBURBAN LAKES IN INTERDISCIPLINARY GEOSCIENCE EDUCATION
Asking the students to form specific hypotheses prior to class field work makes them think about sedimentary processes. Students readily predict differences in grain size and plant communities from shoreline to deep water; less intuitive but possible to derive from known concepts are redox-related depositional features, authigenic and diagenetic mineral precipitation, and identification of turbidites, debris flows or slumps, and unconformities. A transect of three or four cores from shallow to deep water can be used to teach about sedimentary facies, correlation, and transgressive/regressive sequences. Historical research can be conducted online and through local societies, and airphotos provide information about land-use changes since the 1920s or ‘30s. Relatively simple or visual analytical methods are best, including lithological core description, LOI, SEM, XRD, and grain size. Isotopes may be frustrating. Smear slides viewed with a petrographic scope (and using the new TMI online reference available from LacCore) are perhaps limnogeology’s simplest and yet most powerful technique. Some age control is critical: if radiometric or biostratigraphic dating (or correlation with previously dated cores) is not available, students might be asked to try to identify a given time horizon based upon lithological changes. Presentation to the department of a single class poster gives students experience and satisfaction.