HOW EFFECTIVE ARE THE ECOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS AGAINST DRILLING PREDATION - INSIGHT FROM RECENT BIVALVE ASSEMBLAGE OF THE NORTHERN RED SEA
Among morphological attributes, we found size and shape of a species to be a good predictor of drilling frequency. However, substrate affinity shows a pattern contrary to our prediction, because infaunal groups show the highest DF. Although we did not find any significant correlation between predator abundance and DF, the dominance of naticid gastropods and low abundance of muricid gastropods can explain the difference between DF of infauna and epifauna. Siphonate bivalves tend to have lower drilling frequency compared to non-siphonate bivalves. Attachment type does not always show a predictable pattern in deterring drilling predation; however, byssally attached bivalves sometimes show a slightly lower drilling frequency compared to cemented bivalves. Although water depth fails to show any significant effect on DF, it might be affected by the relatively narrow depth range of the studied stations. We did not find significant variation in DF between groups with different habitat; however, DF seems to show a difference between groups with different feeding mode. Our study demonstrates that many of the ecological traits (such as infaunalization, predator avoidance by choosing deeper habitat) that are claimed to be anti-predatory, do not offer effective defense against drilling predation in today's environment—a result consistent with the idea of ever escalating predator-prey dynamics.