PRACTICE-CROSS-CUTTING CONCEPT PAIRS, INQUIRY PATHS, AND THE NATURE OF THE EARTH & SPACE SCIENCES
Using only the performance expectations, the NGSS show an over-representation of some Practices and CCCs associated with ESS DCIs and an underrepresentation of others. Considered together, the choice of Practice + CCC pairs shows “the nature of the Earth & Space Sciences” as compared to the other scientific domains. Most notable are “Developing & Using Models + Systems”, “Constructing Explanations.. + Stability & Change”, and “Analyzing & Interpreting Data + Patterns”. The “Data + Patterns” pairing is important as it communicates that an investigation in the Earth & Space Sciences can involve an investigation of existing data that students will not directly collect (e.g. satellite data). Using pairs of Practices or even the more detailed inquiry paths of Nyman and St Clair (2016), ESS-specific aspects of the education literature can be communicated. Visualization can be expressed as connecting “Using Mathematics & Computational Thinking” with “Obtaining, Evaluating, & Communicating Data” and an observational investigation that utilizes multiple working hypotheses could be expressed as the inquiry path “Analyzing & Interpreting Data” to “Asking Questions..” to “Planning, & Carrying Out Investigations”. In using the language of the NGSS, we can communicate the unique aspects of the ESS that will make it more clear for non-ESS trained teachers to understand “the nature of the Earth & Space Sciences”.