“HOW DID YOU LEARN TO MAKE GEOLOGIC MAPS?” THE IMPACT OF EMBODIMENT, COMMUNITY, AND INSTRUCTION
Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded using four primary themes. Three themes aligned with Mogk and Goodwin’s (2012) domains identified as important to learning in field settings: embodiment, use of inscriptions, and initiation into the community of practice. A fourth theme—instruction—emerged from the data analysis. Embodiment captured participant reflections asserting the importance of immersion in the field and the integration of mind, body and environment for synthesis of geologic concepts. Participants also highlighted the importance of inscribing data on imagery and maps, learning to use tools to record measurements, and taking field notes to aid in recording, interpreting and depicting the landscape. Learning in a community of practice was recognized as important to fostering expertise. Participants highlighted peer group support, apprenticeships, contributing to the discipline through independent work, and teaching. Finally, a theme about the nature of mapping instruction captured two approaches: (1) structured instruction via scaffolded learning, beginning with course work followed by mapping activities that progress in difficulty as instructors provide guidance and feedback to facilitate learning, and (2) ill-structured instruction in which students have minimal field instruction before they “sink or swim.” Participants also recognized the importance of taking ownership for learning, and learning from mistakes. In particular, struggling through the process was sometimes recognized as an important part of skill acquisition.
This study gives voice to the experiences of a sample of geoscientists as they reflect on how they became competent in geologic mapping. Describing the range of instructional and community experiences can add to our knowledge of the role of fieldwork in developing geologic expertise.