CANIS RUFUS HAS CHANGED SIGNIFICANTLY SINCE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CAPTIVE BREEDING PROGRAM, AND BOTH MORPHOTYPES ARE SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT FROM CANIS LUPUS
Cranial geometric morphometric analysis of 240 museum specimens of wild red wolves prior to the CBP, CBP individuals, and specimens of wild and captive grey wolves supports the first hypothesis. Procrustes analysis and one-way PERMANOVA (permutational multivariate analysis of variance) were completed. Red wolves from the 1970s wild populations are different from grey wolves, both wild (p=0.0001) and captive (p=0.0088). Likewise, red wolves in the CBP are different from both wild (p=0.0001) and captive (p=0.0007) grey wolves. Interestingly, red wolves produced by the CBP are significantly different (p=0.0002) from the initial wolves selected and bred. Of these four groups, the only two that are not significantly different are wild and captive grey wolves (p=0.176). This rejects the third hypothesis, as red and grey wolves are significantly different. The second hypothesis is also rejected by grey wolves being significantly different from the initial CBP red wolves. The first hypothesis is supported. This result that red wolves are a separate species from grey wolves supports their continued ESL listing. It is interesting that red wolves have changed significantly in the near 50 years of the CBP. Unique red wolf traits need to be determined.