GSA Connects 2022 meeting in Denver, Colorado

Paper No. 68-1
Presentation Time: 8:05 AM

EDIACARAN SHURAM EXCURSION INTERPRETED, REINTERPRETED, AND MISINTERPRETED


CUI, Huan, Ph.D.1, KAUFMAN, Alan2, XIAO, Shuhai3, ZHOU, Chuanming4, BAELE, Jean-Marc5, KITAJIMA, Kouki6, ORLAND, Ian J.7, DENNY, Adam8, FOURNELLE, John H.9 and VALLEY, John6, (1)Department of Geosciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, (2)Department of Geology and Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, (3)Department of Geosciences, Virginia Tech, 926 West Campus Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24061, (4)State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, China, (5)Department of Geology, Faculty of Engineering, University of Mons, Mons, 7000, Belgium, (6)Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, (7)Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, University of Wisconsin, 1215 West Dayton Street, Madison, WI 53706; Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin, 1215 West Dayton Street, Madison, WI 53706, (8)Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706; Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 902 Battelle Blvd, Richland, WA 99354, (9)Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706

Since the earliest report of the Ediacaran Shuram excursion (SE) almost 30 years ago, the origin of this negative carbon isotope (δ13C) anomaly has been hotly debated. Numerous hypotheses have been proposed, ranging from primary to diagenetic, from local to open ocean signals. As yet, no consensus has been reached. Recently, we applied secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) to study SE carbonates at intra-shelf (Jiulongwan) and outer-shelf (Zhongling) sections of an Ediacaran rimmed basin in South China.

Our investigation shows that diagenesis of the SE at Jiulongwan is mainly limited to neomorphism and dolomitization. Coupled SIMS analysis consistently shows δ13C of ∼–8‰ in both the micritic matrix and secondary dolomite crystals. The mean values of SIMS δ13C data measured from the matrix and secondary dolomite are statistically indistinguishable within each sample, suggesting sediment-buffered diagenesis of δ13C. Importantly, no positive δ13C or any extensive dissolution-cementation texture has been found. These results suggest a depositional or fabric-retentive early authigenic origin for the SE, and argue against previously published hypotheses that the SE was caused by meteoric water diagenesis or late burial diagenesis.

We also revisited the Zhongling section and discovered remarkable μm-scale heterogeneity of δ13C in authigenic calcite cements, with extremely negative values down to –37.5‰. We interpret these cements as methane-derived authigenic calcite resulting from microbial sulfate reduction and anaerobic oxidation of methane during deposition.

We propose that variation of the SE — a notable phenomenon that has been reported in many basins — was modulated by methane oxidation under variable local redox and water depth conditions. The SE likely reflects local carbon cycle anomalies coupled with different degrees of methane oxidation in individual Ediacaran basins and globally triggered by enhanced seawater sulfate and marine transgression during an atmospheric oxygenation event. Our study demonstrates that previously published hypotheses that argue for a post-depositional origin for the SE can be tested by fabric-specific in situ analysis in a detailed petrographic context.