ANALYSIS OF CARBONATE DIAGENESIS ON THE GREAT BANK OF GUIZHOU (SOUTH CHINA) USING GEOCHEMICAL, GEOTHERMOMETRIC, AND GEOCHRONOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES
We used a variety of analytical tools including fluid-inclusion microthermometry, clumped isotopes, C and O stable isotopes, 87Sr/86Sr, trace elements including REE, and U-Pb geochronology. Primary fluid-inclusion data suggest dolomitization occurred over a range of temperatures from 100°C to 180°C, increasing with time, in the presence of 5 to 17 wt. % brine. Calcite entrapment temperatures for primary fluid-inclusion assemblages varied from <~50°C to 108°C. Carbonate clumped isotope (Δ47) measurements on replacive dolomite and vein calcite samples yielded temperatures of 144°C and 52°C, respectively. Fluid-inclusion and clumped isotope temperature estimates are consistent with burial reconstructions.
The δ18O(VPDB) values for dolomite range from -7.68‰ to -1.53‰, and δ13C values range from 0.37‰ to 3.12‰. Vein and pore-fill calcite δ18O values ranged from -17.64‰ to -1.53‰ and δ13C values ranged from -1.67‰ to 3.33‰. For dolomite, calculated initial δ18O(SMOW) compositions for H2O were +11 to +12‰, consistent with fluid inclusion salinities. Some calcite precipitated above 100°C and yielded similar δ18O(SMOW) compositions for H2O, consistent with precipitation from a brine. Other lower temperature calcite yielded δ18O(SMOW) compositions for H2O of –6‰, suggesting meteoric origin.
REE signatures are variable between samples and minerals, consistent with a diverse fluid history. LA-ICP-MS U-Pb geochronology using the Drost et al. (2018) approach of selecting pixels based on criteria in Iolite4 confirm that dolomitization occurred episodically during the Mesozoic Era. Some replacive dolomite formed during mid-late Triassic, while other replacive dolomite and dolomite cement formed as late as the Cretaceous Period (129 ± 30.9 Ma). Calcite yielded less reliable, but clearly younger Cenozoic age dates.