NEW USES FOR OLD DATA: IMPACT OF ANALYTICAL METHODS AND PALEOCOLOGICAL DATA ON INTERPRETATIONS OF EVOLUTIONARY MODE OF MIOCENE CHESAPEAKE GROUP MOLLUSC
We reanalyzed the results of Kelley & Hansen (2001) using the paleoTS framework developed by Hunt (2006) to fit statistical models of evolutionary dynamics (directional evolution, unbiased random walk = URW, and stasis) to Kelley’s dataset. We compared these models to one that incorporated naticid gastropod drilling frequency normalized to shell length as a covariate. Model ranking techniques based on the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) were used to assess the total empirical support each model received.
In contrast to the 2001 results, no support for directional evolution was found, even among traits linked to predation defense. Instead, 54% and 36% of cases are best fit by the URW and stasis models, respectively, with the covariate model best supported in 10% of cases. Of traits useful in species discrimination, 15% were best fit by the covariate model, suggesting a possible role for ecology in evolution. However, none of the predation-related characters was best supported by the covariate model; 65% corresponded to URW and 35% to the stasis model. Results may differ from the 2001 study due to accessing additional models, effects of small sample sizes, and/or the fact that paleoTS ranks models using AIC instead of a hypothesis test against a null and thus provides a superior approach to comparing competing models.