GSA Connects 2022 meeting in Denver, Colorado

Paper No. 90-5
Presentation Time: 9:20 AM

HISTORY OF NATIVE AMERICAN LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCE POLICY IN THE UNITED STATES: IMPACTS ON THE FIELD OF PALEONTOLOGY


OLSON, Hunter1, HENSEL, Hannah2, MONARREZ, Pedro1, BRADLEY, Lawrence3, KEANE, Christopher4 and CARLSON, Sandra2, (1)Department of Geological Sciences, Stanford University, 450 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA 94305, (2)Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616, (3)Geography/Geology, University of Nebraska at Omaha, 6001 Dodge Street, Omaha, NE 68182, (4)American Geosciences Institute, 4220 King Street, Alexandria, VA 22302

We highlight the historical and contemporary policies that govern paleontological research on Native American lands. The United States has a long history of fossil dispossession (stealing) from Indigenous Peoples, through the management of Native American lands (i.e. reservations), and the geological resources therein, within the contiguous United States. These policies have changed dramatically over time and are driven by shifting popular and political ideologies of Native American nations’ sovereignty and self-governance. As of 2022, the United States has a government-to-government relationship with federally recognized Tribal entities, but that has not always been the case. Historians have divided post-contact Native American federal policy into distinct eras: Colonial Times to 1820, Native American Removal and Reservation (1820-1887), Allotments and Attempted Assimilation (1887-1934), Reorganization and Preservation (1934-1953), Termination and Relocation (1953-1968), and Tribal Self-determination (1968-present). Documentation of how the federal policies from each of these eras continue to impact current paleontological research is limited. We summarize major congressional acts, court cases, and historical events that have affected paleontological resource management in Native American territory. We use this historical context to identify federal policy gaps and highlight legal nuances associated with fossil collection and ownership. Finally, we explore how these gaps affect scientific research and highlight best practices for conducting paleontological research on vertebrate, invertebrate, and paleobotanical fossils using the CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Sovereignty (https://www.gida-global.org/care).